From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: do not allow interruptions when waiting for I2C to complete Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:16:36 +0000 Message-ID: <20090211001636.GA19758@fluff.org.uk> References: <1233928837-3401-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20090210165554.0da8bf7c@hyperion.delvare> <4991A4F2.8030506@freescale.com> <20090210171000.1f45cc2d@hyperion.delvare> <4991A970.70508@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4991A970.70508-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: Jean Delvare , linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ben Dooks , Kumar Gala List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:21:04AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > > To the best of my knowledge i2c-mpc falls into the "embedded platforms" > > category and is thus under Ben's responsibility. > > I don't see his Signed-off-by on any patch to i2c-mpc.c for the past > three years (at least). I do see yours, however. You have directly > applied similar patches in the recent past, so of course I will assume > that you would apply this one. My appointment as an embedded maintainer is relatively recent. I do try and review patches, and sometimes these patches get sent to another maintainer. -- Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'