From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: legacy drivers in staging?
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:13:06 +0100
Message-ID: <20090301101306.GB23093@pengutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh"
Return-path: <linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org


--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jean,

when having another look at the status page of legacy drivers in the i2c-wi=
ki,
I stumbled over the drivers from 'staging'. Do they really need to appear
there? I hope the removal of the legacy binding will not depend on those
drivers ;)

Regards,

   Wolfram

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmqX7IACgkQD27XaX1/VRtnqACgh1pssvNbCClchekJIe9Do3dQ
iWwAnAq7FrnZJCB7onNvgmztL0oRjls3
=OoAh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh--