From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Lawnick" Subject: Re: Request for Clarification: old - legacy - new driver model Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:47:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20090310114728.179560@gmx.net> References: <20090218173645.GD3049@pengutronix.de> <20090220135300.353cd53a@hyperion.delvare> <20090225090002.2c31dbf1@hyperion.delvare> <20090226142854.2b6f72e4@hyperion.delvare> <20090305155713.46ac1968@hyperion.delvare> <20090309153851.6d92729e@hyperion.delvare> <20090310103609.0d756775@hyperion.delvare> <20090310114215.181300@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090310114215.181300-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Sh** mailer GUI ... Hi Jean, Hmm, this one did not reach me via gmane ... something seems to be scre= wed up. > Von: Jean Delvare (...) > > Incorporating such methods into subsystem would be much better of > > course. Probably as a sysFs entry automatically added to every adap= ter > > in /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-x >=20 > Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind. >=20 So we finally meet ;-) As this was my goal from the very beginning, I see that I will have to = express myself more clearly. (...) > Contributing code today doesn't bind you to maintaining said code in > the future. You really shouldn't have to worry about this. Once your > code is upstream, the subsystem maintainer (i.e. me for i2c) will tak= e > care of maintaining it. Of course if you _do_ have time in the future > to help with maintenance or contribute more code, this will be very > welcome, but this is in no way mandatory. >=20 Based on this I don't see a problem. --=20 Regards, Michael --=20 Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger geh=F6rt? Der kann`s mit all= en: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01