From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: i2c-omap: Call request_irq with IRQF_DISABLED Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:25:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20090312002545.GE19038@gandalf> References: <7d7e7dd1a4c64c732a21bdfcf2bd42556be708c3.1236345858.git.Ext-Ari.Kauppi@nokia.com> <20090310005222.GE19758@fluff.org.uk> <20090311235908.GC19038@gandalf> <94a0d4530903111711r7728aeabo8aad5ccd51a33d38@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94a0d4530903111711r7728aeabo8aad5ccd51a33d38@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Contreras Cc: me@felipebalbi.com, Paul Walmsley , Ari Kauppi , Ben Dooks , ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:11:17AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > That's my understanding too, but I think it has always been true: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123607685804562&w=2 sure, not merged yet though. And still the threaded irq support can't handle twl4030 where the irq demuxing logic has to run in a thread due to the need of communicating via i2c. -- balbi