From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] I2C driver for MXC Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:26:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20090325092625.GA3029@pengutronix.de> References: <49C89E13.7040801@gmail.com> <20090324094215.GA3471@pengutronix.de> <49C8ABE5.40408@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49C8ABE5.40408-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Darius Cc: linux-arm-kernel-xIg/pKzrS19vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Darius wrote: > > Is this the latest version? There was one where you already received > > additional reviewed and tested tags, so I am confused... >=20 > yes, it is the same V5 version posted on I2C list. So, is there a reason why you dropped these tags? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknJ+MEACgkQD27XaX1/VRtSoACgkzw4aXKMS0hY5ooavt9tWjnj OHoAoL9L0EVp56Tww1Pm6naXCOGapC30 =sGj6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--