From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: fix bit algorithm timeout for low values.
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:42:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090424114259.70f74ccd@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240528153-5370-1-git-send-email-airlied@gmail.com>
Hi Dave,
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:09:13 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>
> When fetching DDC using i2c algo bit, we were often seeing timeouts
> before getting valid EDID on a retry. The VESA spec states 2ms is the
> DDC timeout, so when this translates into 1 jiffie and we are close
> to the end of the time period, it could return with a timeout less than
> 2ms.
>
> Change this code to use time_after instead of time_after_eq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c b/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c
> index d420cc5..e25e139 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int sclhi(struct i2c_algo_bit_data *adap)
> * chips may hold it low ("clock stretching") while they
> * are processing data internally.
> */
> - if (time_after_eq(jiffies, start + adap->timeout))
> + if (time_after(jiffies, start + adap->timeout))
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> cond_resched();
> }
Applied, thanks. I agree this should go in stable.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-24 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 23:09 [PATCH] i2c: fix bit algorithm timeout for low values Dave Airlie
2009-04-24 9:42 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
[not found] ` <20090424114259.70f74ccd-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-04 21:53 ` [stable] " Greg KH
[not found] ` <20090504215325.GA31248-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-05 6:05 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090424114259.70f74ccd@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox