From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.29.2] PXA I2C: Define log level for i2c PXA error report Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:15:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20090511141548.GB3061@pengutronix.de> References: <20090506102202.73d6045d@hyperion.delvare> <20090511112801.GA20283@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Michael Abbott Cc: =?utf-8?B?5LyK5rO9?= , Mark Brown , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Still, I think it would make more sense for these to be one-liners; I=20 > guess routine probing failures ought to be reported in a slightly=20 > different way. I'll see if I can figure out a sensible patch. You might want to have a look here as I also noted once that the pxa-driver is a bit too talkative when writing to eeproms: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org/msg00324.html Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoIMxQACgkQD27XaX1/VRuPPQCgtgP964CKO9ddCoSuMZARNDS9 0FQAoINYFGY3iF5BXBLl2BIdklr/kT7o =U1mc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX--