From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] i2c: ignore active clients detaching during adapter removal. Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:46:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20090529094620.3ccbec69@hyperion.delvare> References: <1233840973-13268-4-git-send-email-giometti@linux.it> <200902051602.44036.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090206102220.GF28554@enneenne.com> <20090206131520.232b53c3@hyperion.delvare> <20090206125907.GA8581@enneenne.com> <20090206221519.5fc3d2b9@hyperion.delvare> <20090209130642.GV7975@enneenne.com> <20090210120839.23592e38@hyperion.delvare> <20090218164812.GA11217@enneenne.com> <20090528095054.03fc2df3@hyperion.delvare> <20090529072835.GA4575@enneenne.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090529072835.GA4575-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rodolfo Giometti Cc: David Brownell , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Kumar Gala , Peter Korsgaard List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 29 May 2009 09:28:35 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:50:54AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Random comments: > > > > * I really would like to get rid of the "virtual" term that has been > > repeatedly abused. Bus segments behind multiplexers are very real. > > > > * I am surprised that you use the term "trunk" for all segments, be > > they in front of or behind multiplexers. When I think of a > > multiplexer, I designate the segment between the controller and the > > multiplexer as the trunk, and the segments behind the multiplexer as > > branches. > > Both fixed. Please review the page again. :) Looks good, thanks! -- Jean Delvare