From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: I2C patch merging for embedded systems Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:47:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20090601224702.GJ14476@trinity.fluff.org> References: <8bd0f97a0905312242k451f5492g1a9b3e6d7f7899a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0905312242k451f5492g1a9b3e6d7f7899a3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Frysinger Cc: ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 01:42:27AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > going by MAINTAINERS, Ben Dooks watches over embedded platforms. does > that mean you'll merge patches posted (e.g. the Blackfin I2C driver), > or should i merge them through the Blackfin tree ? or will Jean still > do this via his quilt ? Even if they are going via the blackfin tree, they need to have been reviewed on ther i2c list by at-least myself and anyone else interested in these. For driver additions, I would prefer if they went via me so that we don't end up with merge fun in the Kconfig of Makefiles. -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.