From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@nachtwindheim.de>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crash on reading the whole PCI config of PIIX4 SMBus
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:30:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090923183029.4f0e8ac5@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ABA4382.1000707@nachtwindheim.de>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:49:22 +0200, Henrik Kretzschmar wrote:
> Jean Delvare schrieb:
>
> > That's right, but it doesn't explain why i2c-piix4 crashes in the first
> > place, not why merely loading it causes further lspci -xxx to crash
> > when they did not beforehand. I admit I am totally clueless.
> >
> Sorry, I expressed myself a bit unclear.
>
> With _worked_ I meant the system crashed (thats what killer commands are for).
>
> lspci -xxx (and co) bring this system down in every case, module loaded or not.
> Obvious this crash occuress when reading the config space in short periods.
Ah, OK, thanks for the clarification.
> lspci (or better proc-fs and sys-fs) do that, and i2c-piix4 does it sometimes.
>
> Looking at read() of drivers/pci/proc.c i had the idea of stalking the critical area with:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> for i in `seq 100`; do
> dd if=/proc/bus/pci/00/07.3 of=/dev/null bs=1 count=n 2>/dev/null;
> done
>
>
> I got no crashes with n == 192, but with n == 193 theres no reaction from the system.
>
> Maybe it's interesting, that (all the time after crashes) the screen
> (in my case the console with a blinking cursor) can still be seen.
> But no reaction on keyboard hits.
I think it is typical of IRQ routing gone out to lunch.
> Also strange is, that the device works well IF those two read accesses have not done the crash.
> I'll test tomorrow without the second read access, just to know if it works.
--
Jean Delvare
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-23 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 15:46 Crash on reading the whole PCI config of PIIX4 SMBus Henrik Kretzschmar
2009-09-22 17:04 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <4AB8F142.9090609-lmEOmhgwvqJeCmjzdEDfrw@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-22 18:07 ` Jean Delvare
2009-09-22 23:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-23 12:59 ` Henrik Kretzschmar
2009-09-23 13:35 ` Jean Delvare
2009-09-23 14:11 ` Henrik Kretzschmar
[not found] ` <4ABA2CA1.8070806-lmEOmhgwvqJeCmjzdEDfrw@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-23 14:15 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090923161518.5cb29107-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-23 15:49 ` Henrik Kretzschmar
2009-09-23 16:30 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090923183029.4f0e8ac5@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=henne@nachtwindheim.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).