From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c-powermac: Simplify pmac_i2c_adapter_to_bus Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:53:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20091105105307.1ded040e@hyperion.delvare> References: <20091014165743.279789a4@hyperion.delvare> <1257382888.13611.81.camel@pasglop> <20091105101627.0a086c04@hyperion.delvare> <1257413363.13611.112.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1257413363.13611.112.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Linux I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:29:23 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 10:16 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > i2c-powermac-01-multiple-msg-not-supported.patch > > i2c-powermac-02-refactor-xfer.patch > > i2c-powermac-03-report-errors.patch > > i2c-powermac-04-include-adapter-in-bus.patch > > i2c-powermac-05-simplify-pmac_i2c_adapter_to_bus.patch > > i2c-powermac-06-no-temp-buffer-for-name.patch > > > > I only have a formal ack from you for patch 01. Patches 01, 02 and 03 > > have been in linux-next for about a month now. I will delete patch 05 > > now. This leaves us with 4 patches still waiting for your ack (02, 03, > > 04 and 06.) I'm not sure which ones you tested so far? > > I tested 4,5 and 6 though 5 will be dropped. 1 is acked. I think 2 and 3 > slipped through the cracks. Where do I find your patch queue ? I'll test > tomorrow. ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/ i2c-powermac-*.patch Thanks, -- Jean Delvare