From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: Shared i2c adapter locking Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:33:13 +1100 Message-ID: <20091117193313.b750804e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20091026133757.7cf87e49.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091029154317.651904b9@hyperion.delvare> <1256828976.2827.27.camel@achroite> <20091105141122.56b6b4f8@hyperion.delvare> <1257429444.2793.2.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <20091105150715.692b5200@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__17_Nov_2009_19_33_13_+1100_.m=8U0Qtf1ssOISm" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091105150715.692b5200@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Ben Hutchings , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mika Kuoppala , Linux I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__17_Nov_2009_19_33_13_+1100_.m=8U0Qtf1ssOISm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jean, On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:07:15 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Presumably this is meant for net-next-2.6, and you'll implement >=20 > Actually I meant to push this to Linus immediately, through my i2c > tree. This is essentially a no-op: the binary code will be the same as > before the patch, so guaranteed to be safe, and this will solve > conflicts in linux-next. Any word on this? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__17_Nov_2009_19_33_13_+1100_.m=8U0Qtf1ssOISm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksCX8kACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wh4wCgjjbOxLXKpfD46dgZudQt8F0G GTUAoJJtBZcV1xUtVw8tP9A34tgBn5dw =/oxd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__17_Nov_2009_19_33_13_+1100_.m=8U0Qtf1ssOISm--