From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:06:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20091204170621.GA10356@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20091021173733.GN26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091022071748.GA17917@crane-desktop> <20091022174304.GO26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091023044451.GB1367@crane-desktop> <20091023170311.GC21723@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091025125353.55d3bfad@hyperion.delvare> <20091026205819.GR26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091027180332.62f2c758@hyperion.delvare> <20091027173001.GT26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091027183619.16b0b952@hyperion.delvare> Reply-To: djwong@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091027183619.16b0b952@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas , lenb@kernel.org Cc: Crane Cai , linux-kernel , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:36:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:30:01 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:03:32PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > I'm only half please with this. You change the function named, but it > > > doesn't follow the calling convention of acpi_dock_match(), which is a > > > little confusing. > > > > > > Anyway, I will need an ack from the ACPI people before I can pick this > > > patch. Or maybe they should even push it upstream themselves. Len/Bjorn: Any opinion on this ACPI quirk patch to make i2c-scmi work on IBM systems? I think the i2c-scmi part is in Jean's tree, but I still need this second patch to the ACPI code itself. Did you pick it up, or should I resend? --D