Re: [PATCH 01/12] i2c-core: Storage class should be before const qualifier

[Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Tobias,

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:56:11 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> 
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser-93Khv+1bN0NyDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 0ac2f90..d610e99 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *i2c_dev_attr_groups[] = {
>  	NULL
>  };
>  
> -const static struct dev_pm_ops i2c_device_pm_ops = {
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_device_pm_ops = {
>  	.suspend = i2c_device_pm_suspend,
>  	.resume = i2c_device_pm_resume,
>  };

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jean Delvare