From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov Subject: Re: status of i2c-cpm and ds2482 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20100108231942.GA3699@radix50.net> References: <20100108020253.GJ3388@radix50.net> <4B471647.8050806@scram.de> <20100108121723.GD4004@radix50.net> <20100108135222.49d7b834@hyperion.delvare> <20100108140111.GF4004@radix50.net> <4B473BCE.8060803@scram.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B473BCE.8060803-NIgtFMG+Po8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jochen Friedrich Cc: Jean Delvare , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > I2C0: i2c@860 { ... > w1@aa { > reg = <0xaa>; > compatible = "dallas,ds2482"; > }; > }; This worked, thanks much Jochen and Jean! I had to use "reg = <18>;", it didn't build with "0x". FWIW, I've also tried restoring 0x18 in normal_i2c in ds2482.c, and i2c-core complained about quick not being supported. Where can I read about what it is? Why is it now required, whereas this worked in 2.6.25.7? With kind regards, Baurzhan.