From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:07:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20100301090714.GB29952@pengutronix.de> References: <20100224110044.GB15181@pengutronix.de> <1267009306-17227-3-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20100228155754.GC16745@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100228155754.GC16745-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ben Dooks , Joe Perches List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:57:54PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrot= e: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:01:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > > Acked-by: Jean Delvare > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 2533fc4..a3c936c 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -2626,6 +2626,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" > > L: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/ > > T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jde= lvare-i2c/ > > +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git >=20 > This is wrong. This is the same tree which I pull ARM stuff from, so= it > needs qualifying with a branch name. $(git ls-remote git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git) suggests two candidates: for-linus/i2c next-i2c And I think for now this is only parsed by humans and everbody should b= e able to notice that e.g. "next-s3c" doesn't contain i2c patches in the presence of the two above branches. So unless there is a syntax to specify more than one branch I suggest t= o keep it as is. Or should we only list next-i2c? Ben, what do you think? (Maybe we can just make it: T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git for-linus/i2c T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git next-i2c but this is a bit too much IMHO. (Who volunteers to list all branches of tip in MAINTAINERS? ;-)) Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig = | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/= |