From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-i801: Don't use the block buffer for I2C block writes Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:09:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20100304100917.GB18304@pengutronix.de> References: <20100304110109.541b846e@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100304110109.541b846e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C , Felix Rubinstein , Oleg Ryjkov , Seth Heasley List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > + /* Experience has shown that the block buffer can only be used for > + SMBus (not I2C) block transactions, even though the datasheet > + doesn't mention this limitation. */ Minor: Comment style? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuPhs0ACgkQD27XaX1/VRs/LACffFj84MCIgk3/rCBsajhFSbb4 BAsAn3YIh9tTaUAntKfHVUqH7VAS8pII =8fgn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o--