From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/24] media/video: fix dangling pointers Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:35:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20100323003525.GC5762@pengutronix.de> References: <1269094385-16114-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20100321144655.4747fd2a@hyperion.delvare> <20100321141417.GA19626@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201003211709.56319.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <20100322213358.31e50b3c@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ALfTUftag+2gvp1h" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100322213358.31e50b3c@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Hans Verkuil , Mark Brown , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --ALfTUftag+2gvp1h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > Personally I'd much rather just not bother setting the driver data in > > > the removal path, it seems unneeded. I had assumed that the subsystem > > > code cared for some reason when I saw the patch series. > >=20 > > Anyway, should this really be necessary, then for the media drivers this > > should be done in v4l2_device_unregister_subdev() and not in every driv= er. > >=20 > > But this just feels like an i2c core thing to me. After remove() is cal= led > > the core should just set the client data to NULL. If there are drivers = that > > rely on the current behavior, then those drivers should be reviewed fir= st as > > to the reason why they need it. >=20 > I tend to agree, now. >=20 > Wolfram, how do you feel about this? I feel a little sorry that I more > or less encouraged you to submit this patch series, and now I get to > agree with the objections which were raised against it. Well, this is a valuable outcome in my book. Maybe seeing the actual amount= of modifications necessary for cleaning up clientdata helped the process. While working on it, I also got the impression that it should be handled differen= tly in the future, of course. Although I was thinking of something different ('i2c_(allocate|free)_clientdata' as mentioned before), I prefer the above proposal as it is most simple. > My key motivation was that I wanted i2c_set_clientdata() to be called > before kfree(). Now that everybody seems to agree that the latter > belongs to the drivers while the former belongs to lower layers > (i2c-core or even driver core), this is not going to happen. So I guess > we want to remove calls to i2c_set_clientdata(NULL) from all drivers > and have only one in i2c-core for now? Fine with me. Let me know if I can assist you with the series. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --ALfTUftag+2gvp1h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuoDMwACgkQD27XaX1/VRtdTQCgiT69KlXjtgYDdBqWpB7vWdkB 66gAoKYHRTMFBlDdJhGo9zOll7xKCsDD =ngpT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ALfTUftag+2gvp1h--