From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: PCA9564: "bus is not idle" issue Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:31:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20100329163149.41df7f10@hyperion.delvare> References: <20100317135223.GD4153@pengutronix.de> <20100318091917.GA27165@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Yegor Yefremov Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Wolram, Yegor, On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:51:09 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> If I don't redirect syslog to a remote host I get i2c fail. So here you are: > > > > Thanks! > > > > [...] > > > >> As far as I can tell the last transaction lacks "=== STOP" state. > > > > Yes. The bus-status being 0x58 instead of 0xf8 says that, too. I wanted to > > check if there is something flaky before. Will have a look, but will probably > > be the weekend. You said it does not appear when you use 2.6.26, right? > > Right. Either it is so seldom, that I don't notice it or it doesn't > occur. But with 2.6.33 it is really frequent. Any progress on this? If this is a regression, we want to fix it quickly. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare