From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-core: erase pointer to clientdata on removal
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:01:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100330130137.7e06bebf@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269942157-23062-1-git-send-email-w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:42:37 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> After discovering that a lot of i2c-drivers leave the pointer to their
> clientdata dangling, it was decided to let the core handle this issue.
> It is assumed that the core may access the private data after remove()
> as there are no guarantees for the lifetime of such pointers anyhow (see
> thread starting at http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/21/68)
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>
> Documentation/i2c/writing-clients | 5 +++++
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients b/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients
> index 3219ee0..5ebf5af 100644
> --- a/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients
> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients
> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ structure at all. You should use this to keep device-specific data.
> /* retrieve the value */
> void *i2c_get_clientdata(const struct i2c_client *client);
>
> +Note that starting with kernel 2.6.34, you don't have to set the `data' field
> +to NULL in remove() or if probe() failed anymore. The i2c-core does this
> +automatically on these occasions. Those are also the only times the core will
> +touch this field.
> +
>
> Accessing the client
> ====================
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 3202a86..b9306b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -117,8 +117,10 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
>
> status = driver->probe(client, i2c_match_id(driver->id_table, client));
> - if (status)
> + if (status) {
> client->driver = NULL;
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, NULL);
> + }
> return status;
> }
>
> @@ -139,8 +141,10 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> dev->driver = NULL;
> status = 0;
> }
> - if (status == 0)
> + if (status == 0) {
> client->driver = NULL;
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, NULL);
> + }
> return status;
> }
>
Applied, thanks.
--
Jean Delvare
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 9:42 [RFC] i2c-core: erase pointer to clientdata on removal Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1269942157-23062-1-git-send-email-w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-30 11:01 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100330130137.7e06bebf@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox