From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PULL] pull request for bjdooks' for-linus/i2c tree Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:43:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20100401134348.GE24265@pengutronix.de> References: <20100307223636.GA27170@fluff.org.uk> <20100308033906.GH8548@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FN+gV9K+162wdwwF" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100308033906.GH8548-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Luotao Fu List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:39:06AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Ben, >=20 > > Luotao Fu (1): > > i2c-pnx: fix setting start/stop condition >=20 > Oops, the patch which is now ad0194e8d624df67a970a36e8ef9e61514e25553 was= the > older one and was superseded by >=20 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5441 Would you pick up an incremental patch? (Then you could maybe finally pick this one [1], too ;)) [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5260 --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku0oxQACgkQD27XaX1/VRsu3QCeO+DKF8LdeMdODp4fdLxToBFs CiMAmgK7Fw1zRvmdgm+/FwlpDyb+Y38J =1/sw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF--