From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: remove_clientdata_to_null-branch Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 19:36:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20100403173646.GB2190@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, just wanted to announce that I put up a branch for removing the i2c_set_clientdata(..., NULL)-calls, so you can see what the current status= is. It will be rebased, so don't work on it (why would you? :)). http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=3Dwsa/linux-2.6.git;a=3Dshortlog;h=3Drefs/head= s/remove_clientdata_to_null The main cleaning patch is a single patch scheduled for 2.6.35 as discuesse= d. I'd like to add another round of review before sending out a patch to this list, probably around -rc4. (Altough I still wonder if we shouldn't wait for 2.6.35-rc1, then we could also catch the calls sitting now in linux-next). Jean, have you noticed this one for 2.6.34? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5784 Kind regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku3fK4ACgkQD27XaX1/VRvUMACbBg5W45ImyVppFkd4LN78pcaZ EycAoMclSF4RHyO3F4iDCzXfzuTgFhea =rv0y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi--