From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
"ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org"
<ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Kalliguddi, Hema" <hemahk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: I2C: Errata i207: Clear wrong RDR interrupt
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:45:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100405224524.GB32401@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB4A540.9080000-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:53:04AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> G, Manjunath Kondaiah had written, on 04/01/2010 07:20 AM, the following:
> >Under certain rare conditions, I2C_STAT[13].RDR bit may be set
> >and the corresponding interrupt fire, even there is no data in
> >the receive FIFO, or the I2C data transfer is still ongoing.
> >These spurious RDR events must be ignored by the software.
> >
> >This patch handles and ignores RDR spurious interrupts.
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Kalliguddi, Hema <hemahk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> >Signed-off-by: Manjunatha GK <manjugk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> >Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> >Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> >Cc: ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
> >Cc: Kalliguddi, Hema <hemahk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> >---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> >index f2019d2..acf4076 100644
> >--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> >+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> >@@ -796,6 +796,19 @@ complete:
> > }
> > if (stat & (OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR)) {
> > u8 num_bytes = 1;
> >+
> >+ /*
> >+ * OMAP3 I2C Errata ID: i207
> >+ * Under certain rare conditions, RDR could be set again
> >+ * when the bus is busy, then clear and ignore the interrupt
> >+ */
> >+ if (!(stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY) && (stat &
> >+ OMAP_I2C_STAT_BB)) {
> >+ /* clear RDR */
> >+ omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR);
> >+ dev_err(dev->dev, "I2C: RDR when bus is busy.\n");
> >+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >+ }
> couple of comments after reading thru the errata:
> a) the sequence in the errata doc is:
> if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR) { /* This is cleaner that using an
> obtuse check using !(stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY) */
> omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR); /* dummy read - i
> think this needs clarification as to why */
> if (omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG) & OMAP_I2C_STAT_BB)
> /* reason for the i2c_read_reg is because errata mentions a dummy
> stat read which might mean something for BB -> I am not sure may
> need to be checked with H/w team. */
> continue; /* recheck - faster response compared to return and re
> generate interrupt */
> }
>
>
> b) does this apply to OMAP2 and OMAP4?
Ok, should this be held for further discussion?
--
Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-05 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-01 12:20 [PATCH] OMAP3: I2C: Errata i207: Clear wrong RDR interrupt Manjunatha GK
[not found] ` <1270124427-11208-1-git-send-email-manjugk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-01 13:53 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <4BB4A540.9080000-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-05 22:45 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2010-04-21 10:39 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100405224524.GB32401@fluff.org.uk \
--to=ben-linux-elnmno+kys3ytjvyw6ydsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hemahk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=manjugk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).