From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: i2c-drivers: Remove dangling pointers Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:06:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20100406000624.GA2893@pengutronix.de> References: <1269094385-16114-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20100405225925.GC32401@fluff.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100405225925.GC32401-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ben, > > here is a patch series fixing I2C drivers which free their private data > > structure and leave the clientdata pointer dangling or do the cleanup i= n the > > wrong order. All occurences were found using coccinelle [1] and the sem= antic > > patch below. The matches have been reviewed, and sometimes adapted. [...] > From the list of things here, there's nothing in here that I should be > worried about (just checking) ? Correct. Just ignore this series. Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku6ewAACgkQD27XaX1/VRvttgCgin2BILMMKf22Dl1cEG/KCBi/ UcEAn2btQWLqN9K0+4x7hl1iT22zsRlp =nHqp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--