From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz-20xNzvSXLT6hUMvJH42dtQ@public.gmane.org>,
Paul Shen <paul.shen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Mike Rapoport <mike-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach-pxa/viper: Fix timeout usage for I2C
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:13:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100412211319.5a43c65b@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2rf17812d71004121057n5131d025pb4965f45b61271f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:57:51 +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > The timeout value is in jiffies, so it should be using HZ, not a plain
> > number. Assume '100' means 100ms here and adapt accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz-20xNzvSXLT6hUMvJH42dtQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Paul Shen <paul.shen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Mike Rapoport <mike-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Janitorial fix, not tested due to no hardware.
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > index 1dd1334..c25921f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> > #include <linux/pm.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > #include <linux/i2c-gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/serial_8250.h>
> > #include <linux/smc91x.h>
> > @@ -453,7 +454,7 @@ static struct i2c_gpio_platform_data i2c_bus_data = {
> > .sda_pin = VIPER_RTC_I2C_SDA_GPIO,
> > .scl_pin = VIPER_RTC_I2C_SCL_GPIO,
> > .udelay = 10,
> > - .timeout = 100,
> > + .timeout = HZ / 10,
> > };
> >
> > static struct platform_device i2c_bus_device = {
> > @@ -778,7 +779,7 @@ static void __init viper_tpm_init(void)
> > .sda_pin = VIPER_TPM_I2C_SDA_GPIO,
> > .scl_pin = VIPER_TPM_I2C_SCL_GPIO,
> > .udelay = 10,
> > - .timeout = 100,
> > + .timeout = HZ / 10,
> > };
> > char *errstr;
> >
>
> One other better and cleaner approach to such inconsistency issue is
> to have a timeout_ms field, and having i2c-gpio.c driver to convert this
> to jiffies using msec_to_jiffies() at run-time.
With what benefit? Expressing time values in units of HZ is very
frequent in the kernel code and shouldn't actually surprise anyone.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-12 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-04 14:08 [PATCH] mach-pxa/viper: Fix timeout usage for I2C Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1270390118-1802-1-git-send-email-w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-12 17:57 ` Eric Miao
[not found] ` <m2rf17812d71004121057n5131d025pb4965f45b61271f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-12 19:13 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
[not found] ` <20100412211319.5a43c65b-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-12 19:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <20100412192010.GM3048-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-12 19:32 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100412213235.1688dda8-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-12 19:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <20100412193943.GP3048-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-12 21:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-12 23:04 ` Eric Miao
2010-04-18 11:48 ` [PATCH V2] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1271591309-22567-1-git-send-email-w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-20 0:20 ` Eric Miao
[not found] ` <z2xf17812d71004191720o3f8660a4kdd31ef9cdb6beae9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-20 1:03 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-04-20 8:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2010-04-20 8:40 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201004201040.00739.marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-20 9:21 ` Eric Miao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100412211319.5a43c65b@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maz-20xNzvSXLT6hUMvJH42dtQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mike-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paul.shen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).