From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c/pnx: Really fix start/stop issue Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:16:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20100420071629.GI19957@pengutronix.de> References: <1271586070-12266-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20100418130457.0341efce@hyperion.delvare> <20100418114021.GA21364@pengutronix.de> <20100420001536.GL32401@fluff.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Az4VpBrmI9+OyhK/" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100420001536.GL32401-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: Jean Delvare , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Luotao Fu , Kevin Wells List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --Az4VpBrmI9+OyhK/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:15:36AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:40:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Hi Wolfram, > > >=20 > > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > The issue was truly solved by the second patch in this thread: > > > >=20 > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5436 > > > >=20 > > > > Accidently, the first one was picked up. So, this patch adds the > > > > remaining diff (and an additional newline). > > > >=20 > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > > Cc: Luotao Fu > > > > Cc: Kevin Wells > > > > Cc: Ben Dooks > > > > Cc: Jean Delvare > > > > --- > > > >=20 > > > > Jean, can you pick this up, so it will be correct in 2.6.34? > > >=20 > > > i2c-pnx is for an embedded platform -> this is for Ben. > >=20 > > Would you mind picking it up if he has not done till, let's say, rc6? H= e did > > not comment to my pointers so far. Other stuff is pending, too (though = not > > urgent). Maybe he is away/busy? >=20 > Could you check my for-linus/i2c branch on git.fluff.org to see if > that fixes the problem for you, and if there is anything else that > needs fixing. Looks good to me. Kevin, are you fine, too? All other patches I carry can wait for the next merge window. Just, I'd rea= lly like to finally get rid of them then :) The branch is here: The following changes since commit 01bf0b64579ead8a82e7cfc32ae44bc667e7ad0f: Linus Torvalds (1): Linux 2.6.34-rc5 are available in the git repository at: git://git.pengutronix.de/git/wsa/linux-2.6.git for-i2c Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (2): i2c/pxa: remove unused macro MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms Wolfram Sang (5): i2c/pxa: only define 'blue_murder'-function if DEBUG is #defined i2c/mpc: drop NO_IRQ i2c/cpm: drop NO_IRQ i2c/ibm-iic: drop NO_IRQ i2c/highlander: remover superflous variable MAINTAINERS | 1 + drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cpm.c | 2 +- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-highlander.c | 5 ++--- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c | 14 +++++++------- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c | 6 +++--- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) Is a branch okay or do you prefer a series? Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --Az4VpBrmI9+OyhK/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvNVMwACgkQD27XaX1/VRutiwCgiRZ79rNjcVqhuhLIsmc+xUKU dssAnj5TeOclvI0rKxJ+SlQtfqLkPR3f =+9D3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Az4VpBrmI9+OyhK/--