From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/3] i2c/ibm-iic: drop NO_IRQ Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:12:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20100427071222.GB22743@pengutronix.de> References: <1270167421-5205-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1270167421-5205-4-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1272351974.24542.9.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1272351974.24542.9.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Ben Dooks , Sean MacLennan List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:06:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 02:17 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq' > > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driv= er is > > only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow. >=20 > Oops... forgot those. Applied, will show up in -next soon. Ah, thanks. I also asked Ben Dooks to pick them up, but better twice than n= ever ;) --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvWjlYACgkQD27XaX1/VRvb4gCfac8AEkOcE0nKPmbeprc4Uhg+ g4QAn2MpshayIMtohOk4S1jiT+Z8QS6B =xJuH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB--