From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: bjdooks' i2c-next Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 04:45:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20100512024512.GB13984@pengutronix.de> References: <20100511232039.GA32733@fluff.org.uk> <20100512000645.GA13984@pengutronix.de> <20100512024117.GN2589@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100512024117.GN2589-SMNkleLxa3Z6Wcw2j4pizdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:41:17AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:06:45AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:20:39AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > >=20 > > > Here's the current contents of my i2c-next. All branches are > > > on http://git.fluff.org/gitweb?p=3Dbjdooks/linux.git;a=3Dsummary > > >=20 > > > Let me know if there is anything that has been missed. > >=20 > > Yes, my branch of old patches. Can also repost a patch series, whatever= you > > prefer: >=20 > Will pull later, in future, prefer i2c- in the headers. I'll > fix up as necessary once pulled. Thanks! Will use i2c-* in future. --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvqFjgACgkQD27XaX1/VRse4ACgxbnk67nVsFCOTdFvMNulFfQ0 oC0An3mwDF+nZsTyvRIN4Z1wUzQnm6tJ =rT1z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm--