From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-xii.c: Use OF instead of platform bus Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:41:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20100518094155.GC4572@pengutronix.de> References: <1274117574-1485-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> <4BF18D47.2030809@pelagicore.com> <4BF252F1.3090301@pelagicore.com> <20100518084548.GB4572@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Cc: Richard =?iso-8859-15?Q?R=F6jfors?= , Ben Dooks , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:24:07AM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hello Wolfram: >=20 > First news about it.... Then lets wait to see how this goes, there > are not so many people using this hw.... IMHO If finaly we move from > of_platform to platform we would be doing a bad mistake, of_platform > is much more clean and useful The busses are going to be merged; the of infrastructure will still be ther= e. Anyway, this is not the right place to discuss this topic... --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvyYOMACgkQD27XaX1/VRucZQCeJwqGfi2PTAZcNVK1i2yUXtLl wi0AoKjWfECvwiKh6SJ5CtNxoJQDHmLJ =7cty -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB--