From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: Controlling Driver Load Order Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:01:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20100527210112.GA5636@pengutronix.de> References: <20100526235246.GA31068@pengutronix.de> <20100527041358.GA14070@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Emanuele Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Anyway, I better understand the subsys_initcall now and applied that > to the i2c-gpio and my i2c chip driver. That worked perfectly for my With chip-driver you mean the PMIC? Yes, that is probably needed there, too. Which driver is it? > issue. I'd be happy to return a patch of this. Would be this the > sort of thing that would benefit from a config option? Something Nope, there is no bigger drawback to this and probably a number of useres wouldn't know what to select here. Just patch the module_init() away. Kind regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkv+3ZgACgkQD27XaX1/VRv77wCfUg+zBpv7AVSx1Qwyi/QOdv+n sPoAn0EB/vt5dZk8V0z4FrwRZF+m+kgm =2QOx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--