From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
David Brownell
<dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: PMBus support in Linux
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 10:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100529085301.GA14982@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529044239.GA19155-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]
> If there is no activity yet, question is if I should write individual drivers or
> if I should define a PMBus infrastructure on top of i2c/smbus first.
> Any thoughts on which approach would be more likely to be accepted into the kernel ?
Did I get this correct: The plan is to support PMBus-devices and let them
report their data in a hwmon-compatible-way?
(If so, did you already check how well PMBus data maps to the
hwmon-sysfs-interface?)
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-29 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 16:16 PMBus support in Linux Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 2:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 4:42 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529044239.GA19155-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 8:53 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
[not found] ` <20100529085301.GA14982-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 15:33 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529153312.GA20814-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 15:47 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529154741.GB7572-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 17:12 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529171229.GA21284-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-30 4:15 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100530041507.GA20222-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-30 15:08 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529023401.GB12507-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 7:39 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100529093929.38e03e06-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 8:16 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529081633.GA7428-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 10:03 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100529085301.GA14982@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).