From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: PMBus support in Linux Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 10:53:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20100529085301.GA14982@pengutronix.de> References: <1275063391.2631.137.camel@groeck-laptop> <20100529023401.GB12507@pengutronix.de> <20100529044239.GA19155@ericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100529044239.GA19155-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , David Brownell , "lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > If there is no activity yet, question is if I should write individual dri= vers or=20 > if I should define a PMBus infrastructure on top of i2c/smbus first. > Any thoughts on which approach would be more likely to be accepted into t= he kernel ? Did I get this correct: The plan is to support PMBus-devices and let them report their data in a hwmon-compatible-way? (If so, did you already check how well PMBus data maps to the hwmon-sysfs-interface?) Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwA1e0ACgkQD27XaX1/VRt7+wCdFqZv57iH00l0cyC9Mq+Uesii rDEAn0Z8XI8CoR8g5lKGpe62a5mKSMC+ =Ry/q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--