From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.35.4] irq: irq and pci_ids patch for Intel Patsburg Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:40:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20101016084018.58671452@endymion.delvare> References: <201009241606.11840.seth.heasley@intel.com> <201010041327.15170.seth.heasley@intel.com> <20101015125428.01120a8d@jbarnes-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101015125428.01120a8d@jbarnes-desktop> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Seth Heasley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:54:28 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:27:14 -0700 > Seth Heasley wrote: > > This patch updates the defines for Intel devices in include/linux/pci_ids.h, referenced in arch/x86/pci/irq.c and drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c, reflecting approved legal branding, and using fuller code-names for products under development. > > > > Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley > > Applied this update, thanks. > > Note that going forward I don't expect (or want!) patches to convert > the development names into marketing names. We should just add new > stuff with the development names (before the product ships) and leave > them that way to avoid unnecessary churn. Fine with me, as long as it is the actual names and not obscure 3-letter shortcuts. -- Jean Delvare