From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: platform/i2c busses: pm runtime and system sleep Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:51:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20101221235127.GC10081@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <201012181559.50347.rjw@sisk.pl> <20101220150051.GI26706@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <201012202213.53902.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012202213.53902.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Rabin Vincent , stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org, linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, LKML List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:13:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, the _solution_ is to get rid of the legacy stuff from those buses in the > first place. Then, they'll just need to use the generic ops without any > trouble. > What you're proposing is a workaround that people will use as an excuse for > not doing the right thing forever. I hadn't actually realised that there was any urgency about removing the old APIs - I'd not really seen much work in that direction. If the intention is to actively push people over to dev_pm_ops that does make a bit more sense.