From: Mark Brown <broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
To: Rabin Vincent <rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org>
Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:14:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101222201413.GB8167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5eSg8vL4Q8yZ9tme38fbS2aAZ-xeLQSNu809B-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:49:39AM +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> And even if we did want to support runtime PM interaction for legacy
> ops, the code for restore() above suffers from the problem of setting
> active even when no callback exists, like I mentioned in the same email
> for resume():
I agree it's confused, I posted an updated patch which should behave
exactly as the old code did - I think the confusion with the legacy
behaviour should be addressed seperately (and ideally in 2.6.37 or at
least a stable patch rather than 2.6.38 which is where the current patch
is targetted).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-22 18:07 [PATCH] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1293041268-7707-1-git-send-email-broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-22 19:19 ` Rabin Vincent
[not found] ` <AANLkTin5eSg8vL4Q8yZ9tme38fbS2aAZ-xeLQSNu809B-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-22 20:14 ` Mark Brown [this message]
[not found] ` <20101222201413.GB8167-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-22 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-30 12:40 Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1293712813-4090-1-git-send-email-broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-04 23:07 ` Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
[not found] ` <4D23A839.6030205-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-04 23:10 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20110104231021.GA18024-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-05 8:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <201101050928.53979.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-13 20:17 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20110113211751.62e878d8-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-13 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101222201413.GB8167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie-yzvpicuk2aatku/dhu1wvuem+bqzidxxqq4iyu8u01e@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).