[PATCH 1/6] i2c-pxa: move i2c_pxa_remove to __devexit instead of just __exit

[PATCH 1/6] i2c-pxa: move i2c_pxa_remove to __devexit instead of just __exit

[Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov]

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
index f4c19a9..0f10955 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ emalloc:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __exit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int __devexit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
 	struct pxa_i2c *i2c = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
 
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_pxa_dev_pm_ops = {
 
 static struct platform_driver i2c_pxa_driver = {
 	.probe		= i2c_pxa_probe,
-	.remove		= __exit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
+	.remove		= __devexit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "pxa2xx-i2c",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
-- 
1.7.2.3

Re: [PATCH 1/6] i2c-pxa: move i2c_pxa_remove to __devexit instead of just __exit

[Uwe Kleine-König]

a bit of explanation would be nice here.  Something like:

	Subject: i2c-pxa: make sure the remove callback is called on unbind 

	When a "pxa2xx-i2c" device was unbound (e.g. via sysfs) the remove
	callback was not called because it was discarded after boot or module
	load time.  Because of that the resources allocated in probe were not
	freed and so a rebind was impossible.

	Fix that by moving the remove callback to .devexit.text.

This way everyone can understand that a real bug is fixed here.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Re: [PATCH 1/6] i2c-pxa: move i2c_pxa_remove to __devexit instead of just __exit

[Ben Dooks]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:24:45AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> a bit of explanation would be nice here.  Something like:
> 
> 	Subject: i2c-pxa: make sure the remove callback is called on unbind 
> 
> 	When a "pxa2xx-i2c" device was unbound (e.g. via sysfs) the remove
> 	callback was not called because it was discarded after boot or module
> 	load time.  Because of that the resources allocated in probe were not
> 	freed and so a rebind was impossible.
> 
> 	Fix that by moving the remove callback to .devexit.text.
> 
> This way everyone can understand that a real bug is fixed here.

agreed, please re-submit

-- 
Ben Dooks, ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/ben/

Large Hadron Colada: A large Pina Colada that makes the universe disappear.

Re: [PATCH 1/6] i2c-pxa: move i2c_pxa_remove to __devexit instead of just __exit

[Ben Dooks]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:05:05AM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>

Please write a reasonable commit message, a null or almost empty commit
message is simply unnaceptable. Please see the Documentation/SubmittingPatches
or ask more about how to write good commit messages.

Also, see Uwe's reply for a good example of how to write a commit message.

> -static int __exit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> +static int __devexit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct pxa_i2c *i2c = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
> @@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_pxa_dev_pm_ops = {
>  
>  static struct platform_driver i2c_pxa_driver = {
>  	.probe		= i2c_pxa_probe,
> -	.remove		= __exit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
> +	.remove		= __devexit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
>  	.driver		= {
>  		.name	= "pxa2xx-i2c",
>  		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,

Right, I think this should fix any hotplug problems that you have.

-- 
Ben Dooks, ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/ben/

Large Hadron Colada: A large Pina Colada that makes the universe disappear.

[PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix unbidding/rebidding of the device

[Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov]

When a "pxa2xx-i2c" device was unbound (e.g. via sysfs) the remove
callback was not called because it was discarded when linking the
kernel.  Because of that the resources allocated in probe were not
freed and so a clean unbind/rebind was impossible.

Fix that by moving the remove callback to .devexit.text.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
index f4c19a9..0f10955 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ emalloc:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __exit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int __devexit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
 	struct pxa_i2c *i2c = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
 
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_pxa_dev_pm_ops = {
 
 static struct platform_driver i2c_pxa_driver = {
 	.probe		= i2c_pxa_probe,
-	.remove		= __exit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
+	.remove		= __devexit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "pxa2xx-i2c",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
-- 
1.7.2.3

Re: [PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix unbidding/rebidding of the device

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello

$Subject ~= s/bidd/bind/g

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix unbinding/rebinding of the device

[Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov]

When a "pxa2xx-i2c" device was unbound (e.g. via sysfs) the remove
callback was not called because it was discarded when linking the
kernel.  Because of that the resources allocated in probe were not
freed and so a clean unbind/rebind was impossible.

Fix that by moving the remove callback to .devexit.text.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
index f4c19a9..0f10955 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ emalloc:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __exit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int __devexit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
 	struct pxa_i2c *i2c = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
 
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_pxa_dev_pm_ops = {
 
 static struct platform_driver i2c_pxa_driver = {
 	.probe		= i2c_pxa_probe,
-	.remove		= __exit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
+	.remove		= __devexit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "pxa2xx-i2c",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
-- 
1.7.2.3

Re: [PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix unbinding/rebinding of the device

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:06:44PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> When a "pxa2xx-i2c" device was unbound (e.g. via sysfs) the remove
> callback was not called because it was discarded when linking the
> kernel.  Because of that the resources allocated in probe were not
> freed and so a clean unbind/rebind was impossible.
> 
> Fix that by moving the remove callback to .devexit.text.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Re: [PATCH 1/6] i2c-pxa: move i2c_pxa_remove to __devexit instead of just __exit

[Ben Dooks]

On 05/01/11 02:05, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> ---

this should be queued, and probably sent to Linus
at the end of the weekend.

Re: [PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix unbinding/rebinding of the device

[Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov]

Hello, all

2011/1/8 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:06:44PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> When a "pxa2xx-i2c" device was unbound (e.g. via sysfs) the remove
>> callback was not called because it was discarded when linking the
>> kernel.  Because of that the resources allocated in probe were not
>> freed and so a clean unbind/rebind was impossible.
>>
>> Fix that by moving the remove callback to .devexit.text.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>

I see this patch is still not pushed to neither linus nor linux-next.
Should I put it into rmk's patch system? Or will it find it's way to main kernel
via other paths?

>
> Thanks
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix unbinding/rebinding of the device

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 04:59:28PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello, all
> 
> 2011/1/8 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>:
> > On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:06:44PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> >> When a "pxa2xx-i2c" device was unbound (e.g. via sysfs) the remove
> >> callback was not called because it was discarded when linking the
> >> kernel.  Because of that the resources allocated in probe were not
> >> freed and so a clean unbind/rebind was impossible.
> >>
> >> Fix that by moving the remove callback to .devexit.text.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I see this patch is still not pushed to neither linus nor linux-next.
> Should I put it into rmk's patch system? Or will it find it's way to main kernel
> via other paths?
rmk's patch system isn't the right place.  Ben needs to take it.  Ben?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |