From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [i2c-tools][PATCH] honor CROSS_COMPILE Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 20:23:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20110108192345.GB4045@pengutronix.de> References: <1294426874-24973-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MW5yreqqjyrRcusr" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294426874-24973-1-git-send-email-nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: linux-i2c List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Honor CROSS_COMPILE for builds. useful for folks using > building for platforms like ARM using cross compiler > toolchain. CC could be reused as well, but usage of > CROSS_COMPILE seems more similar to what we have > for u-boot, kernel etc.. Then again, the vast majority of userspace-projects do not use CROSS_COMPIL= E. Build systems like ptxdist and buildroot have done fine with overriding CC = so far. I don't see much gain in that addition. But thanks for the contribution anyway :) Kind regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0oucEACgkQD27XaX1/VRsnqgCgv15hAP8ZB27bCBoTP2amgwPx 2u0AnRj+AElliN2pBiI7M9PkH8JW4gcY =Px8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr--