From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [i2c-tools][PATCH] honor CROSS_COMPILE Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:44:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20110110154435.640c528b@endymion.delvare> References: <1294426874-24973-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <20110108192345.GB4045@pengutronix.de> <4D28C9D5.8050401@ti.com> <20110108210130.GC4045@pengutronix.de> <20110110152608.536de8e7@endymion.delvare> <4D2B1768.5030303@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D2B1768.5030303-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:27:52 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Jean Delvare had written, on 01/10/2011 08:26 AM, the following: > > I don't have a strong opinion on this either. But I don't get the point > > of setting values for AS, LD, AR etc. when they don't seem to be used > > anywhere. And STRIP is set too, but "strip" hard-coded in > > tools/Module.mk, so I fail to see how that would work. What am I > > missing? > I think I should have done just CC alone. I missed the strip one. but > are we interested in having CROSS_COMPILE? if yes, I can cleanup the > patch and resubmit. Well, you proposed it, so you should know if you are interested ;) What's certain is that I won't apply the patch as is, so it indeed needs to be cleaned up and resubmitted if you want me to apply it. -- Jean Delvare