From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Splitting i2c-designware.c to support PCI drivers Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:30:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20110114213007.58c8b237@endymion.delvare> References: <1295033256-30077-1-git-send-email-dirk.brandewie@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1295033256-30077-1-git-send-email-dirk.brandewie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: dirk.brandewie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, shinya.kuribayashi.px-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Dirk, On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:27:27 -0800, dirk.brandewie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie > > This patch set splits i2c-designware.c core and bus specific portions > in to support the Designware core being behind a PCI device. > > The Intel Moorsetown and Medfield SOC's are supported in the PCI > portion of the driver. We already have the i2c-intel-mid driver for Moorsetown and Medfield. Why would we need another driver? -- Jean Delvare