From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Enable async suspend/resume of i2c devices Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:23:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20110406102313.401e2e6c@endymion.delvare> References: <20110406052335.GA25578@sirena.org.uk> <20110406095240.410b4e7e@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sonny Rao Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Brown , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:16:07 -0700, Sonny Rao wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Sonny, on how many systems did you test it? In particular, did you test > > it on several TV cards (which use I2C a lot and sometimes in complex > > setups)? > > It has only been tested on my x86 system with the light sensor and > lightly tested on an ARM system with about 6-7 i2c devices. I was hoping > the change would help the ARM systems because they make much > heavier use of i2c than the x86 system. I haven't tested on anything > like multiple TV cards because I don't have such a setup -- the ARM > boxes with several i2c devices is the most complex user of i2c I have > at the moment. I meant several TV card models, individually. I don't expect testing many at once to reveal any problem that individual testing wouldn't have. -- Jean Delvare