From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] Enable async suspend/resume of i2c devices Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:31:24 +0900 Message-ID: <20110406223123.GA5297@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20110406095240.410b4e7e@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Jean Delvare , Sonny Rao , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Neither is the case. For these subsystems, the PM dependencies _are_ > known. ... > Now, I have no idea what the situation is with regard to I2C... You definitely don't know *anything* about the relationships for I2C, especially in embedded systems.