From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:22:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110428102212.2d8d607c@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303963358-4652-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Hi Haojian,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:02:36 +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> Both AP and CP are contained in Marvell PXA910 silicon. These two ARM
> cores are sharing one pair of I2C pins.
>
> In order to keep I2C transaction operated with atomic, hardware lock
> (RIPC) is required. Because of this, bus lock in AP side can't afford
> this requirement. Now hardware lock is appended.
I have no objection to the idea, but one question: when using the
hardware lock, isn't the software mutex redundant? I would expect that
you call the hardware_lock/unlock functions _instead_ of
rt_mutex_lock/unlock, rather than in addition to it. Or do you still
need the rt_mutex to prevent priority inversion?
>
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/i2c.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 045ba6e..412c7a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -448,8 +448,11 @@ void i2c_lock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
>
> if (parent)
> i2c_lock_adapter(parent);
> - else
> + else {
> rt_mutex_lock(&adapter->bus_lock);
> + if (adapter->hardware_lock)
> + adapter->hardware_lock();
> + }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
>
> @@ -460,11 +463,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
> static int i2c_trylock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> {
> struct i2c_adapter *parent = i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter);
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (parent)
> return i2c_trylock_adapter(parent);
> - else
> - return rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
> + else {
> + ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
> + if (ret && adapter->hardware_trylock) {
> + ret = adapter->hardware_trylock();
> + if (!ret)
> + i2c_unlock_adapter(adapter);
> + }
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -477,8 +488,11 @@ void i2c_unlock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
>
> if (parent)
> i2c_unlock_adapter(parent);
> - else
> + else {
> + if (adapter->hardware_unlock)
> + adapter->hardware_unlock();
> rt_mutex_unlock(&adapter->bus_lock);
> + }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_unlock_adapter);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
> index 06a8d9c..b283b4e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
> @@ -361,6 +361,9 @@ struct i2c_adapter {
>
> /* data fields that are valid for all devices */
> struct rt_mutex bus_lock;
> + void (*hardware_lock)(void);
> + void (*hardware_unlock)(void);
> + int (*hardware_trylock)(void);
>
> int timeout; /* in jiffies */
> int retries;
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2011042801>
2011-04-28 4:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock Haojian Zhuang
[not found] ` <1303963358-4652-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28 8:22 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
[not found] ` <20110428102212.2d8d607c-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28 8:36 ` Eric Miao
[not found] ` <BANLkTin6jguQue_0Y74jGPnmhCcvWLBjHg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28 14:16 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20110428161625.5eaacb85-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28 14:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-28 14:48 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 14:19 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 4:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: pxa: support hardware lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 4:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mmp: add hardware lock support in PXA910 Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock Haojian Zhuang
[not found] ` <1304003746-12127-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-02 9:27 ` Ben Dooks
[not found] ` <20110502092734.GV15795-SMNkleLxa3Z6Wcw2j4pizdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-02 9:46 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20110502114616.7813da79-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-10 23:08 ` Ben Dooks
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: pxa: support hardware lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mmp: add hardware lock support in PXA910 Haojian Zhuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110428102212.2d8d607c@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).