linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang
	<haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:37:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110428143724.GQ17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110428161625.5eaacb85-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:16:25PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Are you suggesting that the hardware lock wouldn't mind being taken
> twice by the AP side? If it is the case, then indeed the software mutex
> is still needed to prevent it from happening.
> 
> That being said... I guess that avoiding a priority inversion is a good
> enough reason to always take the rt_mutex, regardless of the hardware
> lock implementation.
> 
> So, this patch is
> 
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I guess it makes more sense for me to let Ben apply it, as the other
> two patches in the series are for him too. This will avoid a dependency
> between our trees.

Only change I'd suggest is passing adapter to the hardware_lock/unlock
methods.  Having no arguments what so ever in generic code for this kind
of stuff looks rather strange and limiting.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-28 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2011042801>
2011-04-28  4:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock Haojian Zhuang
     [not found]   ` <1303963358-4652-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28  8:22     ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]       ` <20110428102212.2d8d607c-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28  8:36         ` Eric Miao
     [not found]           ` <BANLkTin6jguQue_0Y74jGPnmhCcvWLBjHg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28 14:16             ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]               ` <20110428161625.5eaacb85-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-28 14:37                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-04-28 14:48                   ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 14:19             ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28  4:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: pxa: support hardware lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28  4:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mmp: add hardware lock support in PXA910 Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock Haojian Zhuang
     [not found]   ` <1304003746-12127-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-02  9:27     ` Ben Dooks
     [not found]       ` <20110502092734.GV15795-SMNkleLxa3Z6Wcw2j4pizdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-02  9:46         ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]           ` <20110502114616.7813da79-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-10 23:08             ` Ben Dooks
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: pxa: support hardware lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mmp: add hardware lock support in PXA910 Haojian Zhuang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110428143724.GQ17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux-lfz/pmaqli7xmaaqvzeohq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).