Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Marvin]

Wei, Stephen,

> Hi, Stephen
> I think if doesn't need to apply the slave address codes, we can use your
> patch.

we use the slave address as part of our nvec mfd driver in the ac100 project, so 
it would be nice to have this merged. Is there any other implemenation for a 
driver which actually use "is_slave"? (beside the one from the older android 
kernels)?

Regards,

Marc

(sorry, accidentally send by the wrong identity to the ml's)


> Thanks
> Wei.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:20 PM
> To: Wei Ni
> Cc: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi;
> ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org;
> linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; Olof Johansson
> (olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org) Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new
> features for tegra i2c
> 
> Wei Ni wrote at Friday, April 29, 2011 12:08 AM:
> > Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:29 AM:
> > > Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:26 AM:
> > > > Hi, all
> > > > Could anyone review these changes?
> > > 
> > > Wei,
> > > 
> > > It looks like some of the patches I recently posted address the same
> > > issues as the patches you had already posted. Sorry for the potential
> > > conflicts.
> > 
> > Hi, Stephen
> > I think your patches address the different issues with my patches.
> > My patches are used for retry transfer and new slave controller.
> 
> Wei, aren't the following two patches basically the same thing,
> except that yours also sets the slave address register, and is a bit
> more wordy:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05464.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05437.html
> 
> Upon further inspection, I don't think any of the other patches I
> posted conflict with the other patch you posted.
> 
> > > Can you please take a look at the patches I posted and comment on which
> > > of those are still relevant given your patches. Even for the cases
> > > where we both posted patches to address the same issue (e.g. use new
> > > slave mode), there are differences in the patches. I simply took the
> > > changes from the chromeos-2.6.37 kernel and cherry-picked them into
> > > the mainline kernel. Are the changes you posted re-written to address
> > > issues that weren't solved in the ChromeOS kernel?
> > > 
> > > Thanks for any feedback on this.
> 
> Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM:
> > From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > *** BLURB HERE ***
> > 
> > Wei Ni (2):
> >   i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
> >   i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller
> >  
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57
> >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/i2c-tegra.h     
> >  |    3 ++
> >  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-- 
Dipl. Phys. Marc Dietrich
Institut für Angewandte Physik
- AG Kleinkühler -
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16
D-35392 Gießen
Germany

Tel. +49 641 99 33462
Fax. +49 641 99 33409
email: marc.dietrich-wkdnK3oF/XPYtB+G+YtuwQgYPMzSbZxj@public.gmane.org
www: http://www.uni-giessen.de/cms/iap/

[PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA]

From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

*** BLURB HERE ***

Wei Ni (2):
  i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
  i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/i2c-tegra.h      |    3 ++
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Wei Ni]

Hi, all
Could anyone review these changes?

Thanks
Wei.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wei Ni 
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM
To: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; lucas.demarchi-Y3ZbgMPKUGA34EUeqzHoZw@public.gmane.org; ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Wei Ni
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

*** BLURB HERE ***

Wei Ni (2):
  i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
  i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/i2c-tegra.h      |    3 ++
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Stephen Warren]

Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:26 AM:
> Hi, all
> Could anyone review these changes?

Wei,

It looks like some of the patches I recently posted address the same
issues as the patches you had already posted. Sorry for the potential
conflicts.

Can you please take a look at the patches I posted and comment on which
of those are still relevant given your patches. Even for the cases where
we both posted patches to address the same issue (e.g. use new slave
mode), there are differences in the patches. I simply took the changes
from the chromeos-2.6.37 kernel and cherry-picked them into the mainline
kernel. Are the changes you posted re-written to address issues that
weren't solved in the ChromeOS kernel?

Thanks for any feedback on this.

> 
> Thanks
> Wei.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Ni
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM
> To: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org;
> lucas.demarchi-Y3ZbgMPKUGA34EUeqzHoZw@public.gmane.org; ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-
> i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Wei Ni
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c
> 
> From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> *** BLURB HERE ***
> 
> Wei Ni (2):
>   i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
>   i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/i2c-tegra.h      |    3 ++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
nvpublic

RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Wei Ni]

Hi, Stephen
I think your patches address the different issues with my patches.
My patches are used for retry transfer and new slave controller.

Thanks
Wei.


-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Warren 
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:29 AM
To: Wei Ni
Cc: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; lucas.demarchi-Y3ZbgMPKUGA34EUeqzHoZw@public.gmane.org; ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; Olof Johansson (olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org)
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:26 AM:
> Hi, all
> Could anyone review these changes?

Wei,

It looks like some of the patches I recently posted address the same
issues as the patches you had already posted. Sorry for the potential
conflicts.

Can you please take a look at the patches I posted and comment on which
of those are still relevant given your patches. Even for the cases where
we both posted patches to address the same issue (e.g. use new slave
mode), there are differences in the patches. I simply took the changes
from the chromeos-2.6.37 kernel and cherry-picked them into the mainline
kernel. Are the changes you posted re-written to address issues that
weren't solved in the ChromeOS kernel?

Thanks for any feedback on this.

> 
> Thanks
> Wei.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Ni
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM
> To: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org;
> lucas.demarchi-Y3ZbgMPKUGA34EUeqzHoZw@public.gmane.org; ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-
> i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Wei Ni
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c
> 
> From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> *** BLURB HERE ***
> 
> Wei Ni (2):
>   i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
>   i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/i2c-tegra.h      |    3 ++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
nvpublic

RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Stephen Warren]

Wei Ni wrote at Friday, April 29, 2011 12:08 AM:
> Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:29 AM:
> > 
> > Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:26 AM:
> > > Hi, all
> > > Could anyone review these changes?
> > 
> > Wei,
> > 
> > It looks like some of the patches I recently posted address the same
> > issues as the patches you had already posted. Sorry for the potential
> > conflicts.
>
> Hi, Stephen
> I think your patches address the different issues with my patches.
> My patches are used for retry transfer and new slave controller.

Wei, aren't the following two patches basically the same thing,
except that yours also sets the slave address register, and is a bit
more wordy:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05464.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05437.html

Upon further inspection, I don't think any of the other patches I
posted conflict with the other patch you posted.

> > Can you please take a look at the patches I posted and comment on which
> > of those are still relevant given your patches. Even for the cases where
> > we both posted patches to address the same issue (e.g. use new slave
> > mode), there are differences in the patches. I simply took the changes
> > from the chromeos-2.6.37 kernel and cherry-picked them into the mainline
> > kernel. Are the changes you posted re-written to address issues that
> > weren't solved in the ChromeOS kernel?
> > 
> > Thanks for any feedback on this.

Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM:
> From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> *** BLURB HERE ***
>
> Wei Ni (2):
>   i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
>   i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller
>
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/i2c-tegra.h      |    3 ++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
nvpublic

RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Wei Ni]

Hi, Stephen
I think if doesn't need to apply the slave address codes, we can use your patch.

Thanks
Wei.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Warren 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:20 PM
To: Wei Ni
Cc: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; lucas.demarchi-Y3ZbgMPKUGA34EUeqzHoZw@public.gmane.org; ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; Olof Johansson (olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org)
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

Wei Ni wrote at Friday, April 29, 2011 12:08 AM:
> Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:29 AM:
> > 
> > Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:26 AM:
> > > Hi, all
> > > Could anyone review these changes?
> > 
> > Wei,
> > 
> > It looks like some of the patches I recently posted address the same
> > issues as the patches you had already posted. Sorry for the potential
> > conflicts.
>
> Hi, Stephen
> I think your patches address the different issues with my patches.
> My patches are used for retry transfer and new slave controller.

Wei, aren't the following two patches basically the same thing,
except that yours also sets the slave address register, and is a bit
more wordy:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05464.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05437.html

Upon further inspection, I don't think any of the other patches I
posted conflict with the other patch you posted.

> > Can you please take a look at the patches I posted and comment on which
> > of those are still relevant given your patches. Even for the cases where
> > we both posted patches to address the same issue (e.g. use new slave
> > mode), there are differences in the patches. I simply took the changes
> > from the chromeos-2.6.37 kernel and cherry-picked them into the mainline
> > kernel. Are the changes you posted re-written to address issues that
> > weren't solved in the ChromeOS kernel?
> > 
> > Thanks for any feedback on this.

Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM:
> From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> *** BLURB HERE ***
>
> Wei Ni (2):
>   i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
>   i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller
>
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/i2c-tegra.h      |    3 ++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
nvpublic

Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Marc Dietrich]

Wei, Stephen,

> Hi, Stephen
> I think if doesn't need to apply the slave address codes, we can use your
> patch.

we use the slave address as part of our nvec mfd driver in the ac100 project, so 
it would be nice to have this merged. Is there any other implemenation for a 
driver which actually use "is_slave"? (beside the one from the older android 
kernels)?

Regards,

Marc


> Thanks
> Wei.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:20 PM
> To: Wei Ni
> Cc: khali@linux-fr.org; ben-linux@fluff.org; lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi;
> ccross@android.com; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org; Olof Johansson
> (olof@lixom.net) Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new
> features for tegra i2c
> 
> Wei Ni wrote at Friday, April 29, 2011 12:08 AM:
> > Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:29 AM:
> > > Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:26 AM:
> > > > Hi, all
> > > > Could anyone review these changes?
> > > 
> > > Wei,
> > > 
> > > It looks like some of the patches I recently posted address the same
> > > issues as the patches you had already posted. Sorry for the potential
> > > conflicts.
> > 
> > Hi, Stephen
> > I think your patches address the different issues with my patches.
> > My patches are used for retry transfer and new slave controller.
> 
> Wei, aren't the following two patches basically the same thing,
> except that yours also sets the slave address register, and is a bit
> more wordy:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05464.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05437.html
> 
> Upon further inspection, I don't think any of the other patches I
> posted conflict with the other patch you posted.
> 
> > > Can you please take a look at the patches I posted and comment on which
> > > of those are still relevant given your patches. Even for the cases
> > > where we both posted patches to address the same issue (e.g. use new
> > > slave mode), there are differences in the patches. I simply took the
> > > changes from the chromeos-2.6.37 kernel and cherry-picked them into
> > > the mainline kernel. Are the changes you posted re-written to address
> > > issues that weren't solved in the ChromeOS kernel?
> > > 
> > > Thanks for any feedback on this.
> 
> Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM:
> > From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > *** BLURB HERE ***
> > 
> > Wei Ni (2):
> >   i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
> >   i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller
> >  
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57
> >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/i2c-tegra.h     
> >  |    3 ++
> >  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-- 
Dipl. Phys. Marc Dietrich
Institut für Angewandte Physik
- AG Kleinkühler -
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16
D-35392 Gießen
Germany

Tel. +49 641 99 33462
Fax. +49 641 99 33409
email: marc.dietrich@ap.physik.uni-giessen.de
www: http://www.uni-giessen.de/cms/iap/

RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c

[Wei Ni]

Hi, Marc
I think no other implementation.

Thanks
Wei.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Dietrich [mailto:Marc.Dietrich-wkdnK3oF/XPYtB+G+YtuwQgYPMzSbZxj@public.gmane.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:28 PM
To: Wei Ni
Cc: Stephen Warren; khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; lucas.demarchi-Y3ZbgMPKUGA34EUeqzHoZw@public.gmane.org; ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; Olof Johansson (olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new features for tegra i2c


Wei, Stephen,

> Hi, Stephen
> I think if doesn't need to apply the slave address codes, we can use your
> patch.

we use the slave address as part of our nvec mfd driver in the ac100 project, so 
it would be nice to have this merged. Is there any other implemenation for a 
driver which actually use "is_slave"? (beside the one from the older android 
kernels)?

Regards,

Marc


> Thanks
> Wei.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:20 PM
> To: Wei Ni
> Cc: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi;
> ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org;
> linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; Olof Johansson
> (olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org) Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: tegra: add some new
> features for tegra i2c
> 
> Wei Ni wrote at Friday, April 29, 2011 12:08 AM:
> > Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:29 AM:
> > > Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:26 AM:
> > > > Hi, all
> > > > Could anyone review these changes?
> > > 
> > > Wei,
> > > 
> > > It looks like some of the patches I recently posted address the same
> > > issues as the patches you had already posted. Sorry for the potential
> > > conflicts.
> > 
> > Hi, Stephen
> > I think your patches address the different issues with my patches.
> > My patches are used for retry transfer and new slave controller.
> 
> Wei, aren't the following two patches basically the same thing,
> except that yours also sets the slave address register, and is a bit
> more wordy:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05464.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05437.html
> 
> Upon further inspection, I don't think any of the other patches I
> posted conflict with the other patch you posted.
> 
> > > Can you please take a look at the patches I posted and comment on which
> > > of those are still relevant given your patches. Even for the cases
> > > where we both posted patches to address the same issue (e.g. use new
> > > slave mode), there are differences in the patches. I simply took the
> > > changes from the chromeos-2.6.37 kernel and cherry-picked them into
> > > the mainline kernel. Are the changes you posted re-written to address
> > > issues that weren't solved in the ChromeOS kernel?
> > > 
> > > Thanks for any feedback on this.
> 
> Wei Ni wrote at Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:09 PM:
> > From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > *** BLURB HERE ***
> > 
> > Wei Ni (2):
> >   i2c: tegra: Retry transfer when unexpected/no_ack status is detected
> >   i2c: tegra: use new i2c slave controller
> >  
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   57
> >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/i2c-tegra.h     
> >  |    3 ++
> >  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-- 
Dipl. Phys. Marc Dietrich
Institut für Angewandte Physik
- AG Kleinkühler -
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16
D-35392 Gießen
Germany

Tel. +49 641 99 33462
Fax. +49 641 99 33409
email: marc.dietrich-wkdnK3oF/XPYtB+G+YtuwQgYPMzSbZxj@public.gmane.org
www: http://www.uni-giessen.de/cms/iap/