From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: V2 API Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:06:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20110930130645.5ff8576b@endymion.delvare> References: <201109281559.45060.david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> <201109301134.38697.david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201109301134.38697.david.goodenough-hd8OpYRHSlec/75gGNOK3g@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Goodenough Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:34:38 +0100, David Goodenough wrote: > On Wednesday 28 Sep 2011, David Goodenough wrote: > > Doing a Google search looking to see if there was userland support > > for SMBALERT messages I saw references to the V2 API which last year > > was "being developed". Did this happen, and is it defined anywhere? > > I take it from the fact that no-one has replied, that the V2 API is > not being worked on or has stalled. I take it from the fact that no-one has replied, that "V2 API" is an awfully vague subject line, so odds are that nobody read your post in the first place. Try to come up with a better subject line next time. > Is there any way using the > existing API for userland code to be notified of an incomming > SMBALERT? Not that I know of, and I wasn't even aware that efforts had ever been ongoing to achieve this. -- Jean Delvare