From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: convert drivers/i2c/* to use
 module_platform_driver()
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:50:28 +0100
Message-ID: <20111127205028.708ea59f@endymion.delvare>
References: <1322374332.2226.1.camel@phoenix>
	<20111127202212.44ebf4c4@endymion.delvare>
	<20111127194648.GA26533@pengutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111127194648.GA26533-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>, Jochen Friedrich <jochen-NIgtFMG+Po8@public.gmane.org>, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet-OfajU3CKLf1/SzgSGea1oA@public.gmane.org>, Guan Xuetao <gxt-TG0Ac1+ktVePQbnJrJN+5g@public.gmane.org>, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>, Barry Song <21cnbao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi-Y3ZbgMPKUGA34EUeqzHoZw@public.gmane.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:46:48 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > -module_init(gpiomux_init);
> > > -module_exit(gpiomux_exit);
> > > +module_platform_driver(gpiomux_driver);
> > 
> > This one would be better as a separate patch, as it touches a different
> > subdirectory, which I am responsible for.
> 
> ... which has a patch pending[1], hint ;)
> 
> [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/9432

Yes, that's one of the reasons why I think a separate patch would be
more appropriate. It might be difficult to avoid patch collisions
otherwise.

-- 
Jean Delvare