From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [i2c-tools][PATCH] honor CROSS_COMPILE Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:49:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20111204204911.19fefcb5@endymion.delvare> References: <1294426874-24973-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <20110108192345.GB4045@pengutronix.de> <4D28C9D5.8050401@ti.com> <20110108210130.GC4045@pengutronix.de> <20110110152608.536de8e7@endymion.delvare> <4D2B1768.5030303@ti.com> <20110110154435.640c528b@endymion.delvare> <4D2B1BDD.9070601@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D2B1BDD.9070601-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:46:53 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Jean Delvare had written, on 01/10/2011 08:44 AM, the following: > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:27:52 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >> I think I should have done just CC alone. I missed the strip one. = but=20 > >> are we interested in having CROSS_COMPILE? if yes, I can cleanup t= he=20 > >> patch and resubmit. > >=20 > > Well, you proposed it, so you should know if you are interested ;) > >=20 > > What's certain is that I won't apply the patch as is, so it indeed > > needs to be cleaned up and resubmitted if you want me to apply it. > >=20 > Touch=E9 ;). will resubmit it :) thanks for the pointers in strip. I = will=20 > try to ensure that we have just the ones we need. You did not resubmit anything, and you just missed the train. If you want your patch in i2c-tools 3.1.1, please consider resubmitting with the required changes applied. --=20 Jean Delvare