From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: reorganize muxes to a standard pattern Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:46:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20120107144559.GA2537@pengutronix.de> References: <1321220474-11378-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20111127214847.547542fb@endymion.delvare> <87sjl9gtcv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20111128092227.3d5d6a25@endymion.delvare> <20111128093835.GA4243@pengutronix.de> <874nxoh8l5.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20111128125751.3d6a3ca7@endymion.delvare> <20120107153820.45ed4b37@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120107153820.45ed4b37-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Peter Korsgaard , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Guenter Roeck , Rodolfo Giometti , Michael Lawnick List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:38:20PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:57:51 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:58:30 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > > >>>>> "Wolfram" =3D=3D Wolfram Sang writes: > > >=20 > > > >> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/7171/focus=3D72= 44 > > > >>=20 > > > >> Ah, yes, that's the discussion I was looking for, thanks for digg= ing it > > > >> out. My point wasn't totally wrong back then, but Wolfram's is si= mply > > > >> better, I admit. > > >=20 > > > Wolfram> I agree :) Okay, so I'll update the documentation as well. = What about > > > Wolfram> include/linux/gpio-i2cmux.h and its users? I'd like consist= ency, but > > > Wolfram> renaming header files is not too nice... > > >=20 > > > Indeed. If we were to rename it we should also rename struct > > > gpio_i2cmux_platform_data. > > >=20 > > > I don't feel strongly about it - It will break for existing users, but > > > there's probably not too many of those. Your call. > >=20 > > I see exactly 1 user of in the upstream kernel > > tree, and that is gpio-i2cmux itself. So I'd say no big deal renaming > > it, and actually if we intend to rename header files and/or structures, > > the sooner the better. >=20 > Wolfram, Peter, any progress here? I think Wolfram was supposed to send > an updated patch but I did not receive anything. -EBUSY :( It *is* on my todo-list, though... --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8IWqcACgkQD27XaX1/VRuxCgCeLh2x53WKATEnDR1GF3iXGGUn yrsAn0/gKXabSirrfK7/V86HiiCz63qA =dZqO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--