From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Support for Netlogic XLR/XLS I2C controller. Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:07:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20120125150724.5f86e3a9@endymion.delvare> References: <1326984171-21209-1-git-send-email-jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com> <20120125134055.GC4755@pengutronix.de> <20120125134514.GA2054@sirena.org.uk> <20120125135236.GD4755@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120125135236.GD4755-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Mark Brown , "Jayachandran C." , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Ganesan Ramalingam List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:52:36 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:45:15PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > Please say [PATCH V3] instead of just [PATCH], this helps reviewing. > > > Also, start a new mail-thread, it might get too messy if 10 different > > > versions get comments. > > > > ...but note that opinions vary on bothering the versioning (it's not > > likely to actually annoy anyone though). > > Huh, never heard of those. When digging old/lost/forgotten patches via > search engines, the versioning does help a lot, for example. Even when > going through huge mailboxes, I'd think this may help to prevent that > old patches are picked? What is the reasoning against versioning? Versioning is good, I don't think there's anything to argue about. -- Jean Delvare