From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c/designware: dw_i2c_init_driver as subsys initcall Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:55:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20120224125459.GE5622@tarshish> References: <1321419487-2353-1-git-send-email-pratyush.anand@st.com> <20111116051440.GA3142@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20111116052718.GE2286@DLH10011> <20111116082233.GB10335@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <4F476E30.60807@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F476E30.60807-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Shiraz HASHIM , Pratyush ANAND , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Armando VISCONTI , Vipin KUMAR , Rajeev KUMAR , Deepak SIKRI , Vipul Kumar SAMAR , Amit VIRDI , Bhupesh SHARMA , Bhavna YADAV , Vincenzo FRASCINO , Mirko GARDI List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Viresh, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:32:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 11/16/2011 1:52 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > > Dependencies should be stated explicitly. Since this subsys_initcall thing is > > quite common among the i2c masters I'm willing to ack this one for now. But > > the real solution is to make the dependencies between devices clear and > > explicit. > > Baruch, > > Did you apply this patch? Nope. If you want it applied please end to the I2C subsystem maintainers. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -